Tuesday, August 2, 2022

Epilogue

 Dear आशय  readers, 

Thank you for the journey together with this blog! I started this blog to capture the experiences of working in Nepal. Since my circumstances have changed, so has my engagement in writing in that exact context. I plan to retire this blog. 

If you have any interest in my experiences in a different context, I invite you to visit my new blog, The South Asian Immigranthttps://saimmigrant.blogspot.com/

Thank you again!

In peace, 

- Aasaya


Monday, February 21, 2022

Tribute to Dr. Paul Farmer

 "Paul Farmer believed all lives have dignity," read a headline in the Opinion Column of The Washington Post as I was scrolling through the news back from work. Why would it say "believed" was the first thought that crossed my mind. It did not occur to me that Paul Farmer is mortal. And that mortality is ruthless in its choice of victims and timing. Alas, Dr. Farmer was the casualty. He passed away today in his sleep, at age 62. 

Sorrow seeped in, almost a sense of helplessness, when it was clear that Dr. Farmer is no more. I first learned of him through Tracy Kidder's book "Mountain Beyond Mountains." As a young resident learning the trades of patient care, reading about Dr. Farmer's work was an entirely different revelation. It was as if it stretched my awareness of human capabilities in the realm of kindness and empathy. It was a profound presence, knowledge that there is a living, walking fellow human being doing extraordinary deeds born of purest concerns. Privileged to read several of his books and writings subsequently, I felt nurtured by his thoughts and voices. The word "solidarity" reverberates a totally distinct significance to me just because of his use of the word. My comprehension of the relationship and moral claim to the material resources of collective human existence, particularly for the most disadvantaged amongst us has been monumentally altered by his insights. He sought and brought the most advanced care to the most depraved when the default expectation was "impossible." He saw disease in broader context, with its social roots. And not just made the observations but sought and brought the solutions even to those tentacles of diseases. Seeing his work from distance educed tracings of longer trajectories of human goodness. You could hear in his voices and deeds the vestiges of greats of remote past, Rudolph Virchow, in my mind drawing a straight line. 

He will belong to one of those giants of history, I suspect. And he will live through works of generations to come. Yet, I can not deflect a gnawing sense of loss. Of a human being in flesh and bones who may have yet another novel insight, yet another demonstration of what is best in humans. Perhaps this feeling is accentuated because of the times we are living in. When we appear to be shriveling in our benevolent form as human being. Authoritarians seem to be on the rise everywhere. And wars seem to be looming. Those with convictions about goodness seem to be meager. And everyday folks seem to have lost a sense of boundary between kindness and cruelty. 

While you belong to the long arc of the history, enouncing your presence in moments of kindness by countless lives you have touched, including my own better moments, Dear Dr. Farmer, a kind and tender soul, I will miss you tremendously. Thank you for the life you spent among us in mortal form. 

Monday, November 2, 2020

Elections

 It is certain there are more sophisticated manners of understanding and portraying the current American predicament. But as someone with scant understanding of the mechanics of societies and exiguous historical perspective, feeling is the apparatus I deploy. Feeling soaked in the current. Taking cues in pitches of voices, smiles, and grimaces. And from that perspective, the best I can characterize the prevalent feelings is that of lost innocence. 

For a non-citizen bystander in this country, the strife this country has gone through in the past several years has a distinct essence. It is largely an expression of existential angst of  a segment of the population that has banked its identity and entitlement on a narrow set of racial and religious affiliation.  In the bubble it has lived in, perhaps afforded by the military and economic superpower status of the country, it has no connection to the real suffering-- of material poverty,  oppression with no pathway of escape, randomly inflicted harm with no prospects of restitution, institutional violence as a tool to "keep people in their place." It has mistaken lethargy in lassitude of prosperity as suffering. And is trying to shake off this dullness in imagined reality. A reality where its existence is threatened by some external factors. External factors where it does not have to take any ownership, emotional connection. No wonder immigrants, black and brown people are the root cause of all its ailments. No wonder its religion is threatened by godless people and people who worship other gods. If you stack these claims against measurable markers the results are agonizingly comical. But that is a largely useless exercise. It has no interest in validity of these acclaims. Because the primary purpose of this manufactured reality is to shake off that mental fog of an aging entitlement. It knows that the tool is constructed of lies but it needs it to transcend the rut. The visceral feeling it has evoked-- that it's existence is under threat-- is what ultimately matters, wakes it up, enlivens it. And it is a strong feeling. Affirming of some vitality. They appear almost possessed, teeming with angry energy, ready to be cruel. 

When the moments have been opportune, it has not hesitated to flash that underbelly of cruelty. In caging children. In snatching children from their parents. And not even bothering to keep track of parents such that there are hundreds of children adrift without parents. In the violence of words and body language when it speaks of others-- immigrants, racial minorities, sexual minorities. 

As an immigrant, this guise of the country is profoundly disorienting.  A central premise, I assume, when someone leaves the comfort of their surroundings to a new society, is their perception of the benevolence of that society. If they perceived it as harmful, I would surmise, there is no incentive to move. In this collision of expectations and the current reality, we, the immigrants, have lost our innocence. At anytime, of the 10 persons you see on the street, you are now equipped with an understanding that 4-5 of them very likely have a visceral animus towards you even before he/she speaks a single word, just because of the way you look or talk. 

Citizens of this country are voting. And we hear the emphasis that the outcome is going to have monumental consequences. It may be true to some extent. A slide down the path of further cruelty is guaranteed if one of the sides wins. But it is also equally clear that there is going to be no easy healing. We are talking about lost innocence, possessed population that has dabbled in cruelty. These things do not seem to have facile solutions. In the mean time, the major question at the personal level will be- how do we preserve decency amidst acrimony, if not for ourselves, for our children who have had to witness this human ugliness?

Monday, April 27, 2020

Pandemic Meets Politics

Diseases are ruthless. The real ones. Those that afflict human beings, persons. Someone's loved ones, someone's children. Not necessarily those in the textbooks; those are too neatly folded. Too precise. Too predictable. This is a lesson we physicians learn rather late into our training, at least that was the case with me. Brash certainty borne of assiduously memorized facts are challenged by reality. Completely convinced of a particular diagnosis after an elaborate history and physical exam, a puny blood test with normal result delivers a noxious blow to the plump ego of a diagnostician. An ego caressed by superior performance in classrooms, knowledge tests. A missed critical piece of information leads to an unwarranted pursuit that is a waste of everything good. An arrogant dismissal of some other colleague's ability blurs a perfectly rational treatment choice and on subsequent introspection flames an agonizing humiliation. Time and again personal hubris collides with objective reality that does not fit the smoothness of knowledge, certainty. It forces you to factor in uncertainty. It forces you to factor in non-conformity. 

To perform well, we still need knowledge, more the better. We still need to memorize colossal amount of facts. But certitude is best left behind. Our treatment decisions are ultimately probabilities that have to dance with the unknowns of a complex human being. Those among us who are exemplary physicians are skilled at ranking facts, humble of the uncertainties that lie ahead, masterful at sensing patient's priorities and fears, motivated by utmost good faith in assuaging suffering. Ultimately, treatment we do is still a best effort. Not a guaranteed intervention. Reality continues to offer disappointments, surprises, gratification. Our personal hubris is clobbered, hopefully, in the process. We learn of a newer reality where our performance and expectations are appraised in relative certainties, relative successes. 

We surrender our hubris to the ruthlessness of diseases. And try to cajole, trick, fool the disease wherever we find its weakness. It is not really a heroic job. A rather cunning and tedious one. 

COVID-19 pandemic is ravaging the world. As of today, over 200,000 people are recorded deceased from the disease. The actual mortality is likely much higher as not all who died from the disease are tested, particularly in resource-starved countries. Newspapers report heart wrenching stories of lives lost. Young, old. Colleagues working heroically in healthcare settings. 

While a pandemic is beyond the scope of my expertise, certain characteristics do not feel far off from what we see in clinical care- just magnified at a staggering scale. At this phase, uncertainty is the emphatic attribute of the disease. And we are best served recognizing this. All the understanding we have of the disease is based on very short-duration information. This disease has not played out in its full extent yet. So we do not even have a tangible data set of disease characteristics. Our interventions are guided by interpretations of these limited information that are likely to evolve continuously as more information is gathered. So the prime question is how best to make decisions when best practices are not known. 

This quandary is a familiar sentiment for medical trainees (which we are lifelong to a varying extent) when confronted with a clinical situation where we have no previous experience or knowledge base to tap into. The usual remedy to this predicament is we draw on the wisdom of someone who has dealt with the situation before. Or someone who studies or researches these problems on a daily basis. Sometimes these are known problems to them and a simple resolution occurs with gratifying result. At other times, this is equally perplexing problem but they have broader insights into the overarching patterns and nuances. Their hunches are more likely to be successful than ours. Recognizing and trusting these skilled persons is an art form as well. Better ones among us are better at doing it. 

As we look at the global response to pandemics it is not hard to see who are doing better than others.  And it is clear where the disease is met with hubris, society has not fared well. Unfortunately, the country I currently live in, my second home, falls into the category where disease was met with an utterly incapable political leadership crippled by cocksure callousness nurtured by sheer stupidity. It is painful to read or watch the news of the political response from the federal level. Conspicuously absent is a notion of grief in this ongoing daily devastation of human lives. Happening in thousands. In this nation, currently, grieving for others is a personal enterprise. It is not happening at a collective level. Shamelessness of political leadership is just stunning. 

The devastation that could have been has probably been mollified somewhat by heroic efforts happening at local levels. But there is no doubt that lack of an organized humble leadership at the national level, that could avail the extraordinary expertise of extremely capable people who think about these issues everyday, has cost a lot of lives. 

When a ruthless disease demands an agile response, a leadership whose sole qualification is brazen contempt for the lives and dignity of "others" does not seem to be a good match. 

Sunday, July 21, 2019

Round Them Up



O brothers
My dear brothers
My brothers of fate

Let us
Round them up

Those of filth
Of poverty
Smelling of sweat
Smelling of fear
Smelling of desperation
Begging at our borders

Let us
Snatch their kids
Kids of lesser worth
Kids of lesser innocence
Kids of others
From wailing mothers
From crying fathers

And cage them

Who cares where they are
Who cares if nobody knows where they are
Children of lesser worth
Parental love of lesser worth
Human attachments of lesser worth
Let them cry in hunger
Soak in their excrement
Be terrified
Be terrorized

Let them learn my wrath
An apt lesson for childhood
For these lesser creatures
Of my magnanimity
Of my grandiosity

For I am born with these privileges
Round them up

Round them up
Those who toil in the scorching sun
Those menial workers with temerity to do what I do not want
Those living in shadows dreaming of something greater
Those filths juxtaposed to my unimpeded entitlement
My birthright privilege

O my brothers
Of myriad shapes and forms
How would I do this without you?

If not for you nodders and winkers
If not for you cynics convinced that cynicism is bravery
How would I venture to new zeniths of cruelty
Mind you, the only means
To teach a lesson
To these filths

If not for you people of god
How would I justify acts of cruelty
Guaranteed you have the heaven for I belong to a clan
As long as I hate gays, aborting mothers, others that are not us
You give me passages for every rationalization I need
You have helped me shed kindness
For it is a worthless attribute
that demands unnecessary sacrifices
When we could just congregate in the gilded halls, just you and me
Ensuring heaven belongs to us
Only to us

If not for you masters of words
Academics and pundits and policy wonks and elites
who have finessed the art of reducing the others to economic worth
Skeleton measured in dollars
How suave you can be
Beauty it is
Seeing you bury my barbarism
In your drawls and pauses
Feigning objectivity
How sweetly you dehumanize these filths
And anesthetize the people of your kind
Numb to my ventures in cruelty
For they see dehumanized economic elements
you give me the stepping stone

O brethren
Who have given me so much
I promise you awe
You will be amazed at what is possible
Had you not started with dog whistles
How would we have reached thus far
We can now spite at the others with pride
Tear their family apart
Cage their children and revel
Bang their door with our fiery fists
Sending chills down their spine
Behold the sight of soggy, prone, entangled corpse of a father-child in last embrace
and celebrate it as a trophy
Of the success our spite bodes

Let us
Round them up

Who cares we sit on gold
Anything wasted on them is a loss
When what we are really after is
to shake dignity out of their existence
To teach them servitude
For our grandeur depends on servile others
Our self-worth feeds on their fears

Let us
Round them up

My brothers
I know you will be there
In solidarity
As long as it is about the others
No morals will stop us
For we have sloughed our empathy,
No horrors will bother us
You will find reasons for every atrocity we have to commit
You will tuck your tail and follow me
For we are marching to a wonderland
Where it will be only you and me
And no others

Let us
Round them up
Hiss



Saturday, July 1, 2017

EMRs and Alternative Facts

As students of medicine, we have always placed an esteemed emphasis on "history taking." A process of listening to the patient while gathering clues to the ailment. William Olser, often described as "Father of Medicine," had this to say on the matter:
"By historical method alone can many problems in medicine be approached profitably." 
It is still a dictum we hold close to our heart and try to impress upon our students and trainees.

Alas, Dr Osler lived in a world without electronic medical records (EMRs). I sometimes find myself pausing in embarrassment while gathering information from the patient alongside the EMR. "How many doses of zoledronate infusions have you received so far?" I would be asking the patient while simultaneously pulling up the medication administration record. They would tell a number that turns out to be completely different than what has actually been given. As we find out a different record of actual medication administration, patient winces, and I blame myself for putting her on the spot by asking the question. I could have just explored the EMR beforehand to gather that data for something that I can hardly rely on patient's memory. And over the years I have learned how unreliable it is to base decisions based on patient recall. On my good days now, I would have performed a thorough exploration of patient's EMR and gathered necessary information before I enter patient's room to talk. Good students of medicine these days put due diligence in gathering exhaustive information from EMR. I am certain Dr Osler would have emphasized this in more eloquent terms were he around.

Still, the importance of listening to patient holds an irreplaceable import. There are no descriptions of patient's emotional states by a clinician's notes that can substitute a voyage of thoughts in a calm absorption of  patient's patter. No algorithm of information can match the patient's descriptions of their priorities and beliefs. You might have the right answers for the disease afflicting the patient. But listening and talking with the patient is where you build the trust. Ultimately, we humans are not automatons making decisions on rational choices. Our patients weigh their trust on us to adopt our recommendations. We might be brilliant in medical sense but if they do not find an emotional plane of trust, they might not adopt our solutions, even if by objective measure it is a wrong choice.

A good doctor in the current environment is one who can be exhaustive at data gathering from the EMRs, capable of listening and connecting to the patient, agile in compiling information needed to manage the issue in the most evidence-based manner, able to synthesize emotional information with objective data, and masterful in conveying the information in literally and emotionally understandable terms to the patient.  

**********************************************************

Recently, we have been introduced an oxymoron term "alternative facts." While the messenger received some serious criticism, unfortunately, there is a populace who share her belief. If we were to heed the back and forth between the protagonists and antagonists of the alternative facts, we might find ourselves confused about the reality itself. If we do not belong to any particular ideological camp, we might throw our hands up in the air and say the world is an illusion anyway! There is no reality!

As I think about this I can not help going back to the EMRs. There I see two discernible aspects of realities in that interaction:
1. Objectively verifiable information (e.g. the information about what date, time zoledronate was administered)
2. Interactions involving feelings/thoughts

The objective information is fixed and incontestable. If the patient has received medication only in this facility and there is no reason to doubt the accuracy of documentation, that information is incontestable. There is no subjectivity.

But in our human interactions not everything is objective and fixed, we rely on feelings and perceptions. We imagine. We dream. Not by threading the plausible and actual but rather freewheeling in the cloud, in the subconscious, beyond our realm of reasons and rationality. Do I like this doctor? Does he sound reliable?

We are entitled to an unbridled freewheeling in the perceptual realm. But if we try to claim that objective reality should also acquiesce to our perceptual world, that's when the problem springs. When we start claiming that our feelings of the number of zoledronate administered should trump the objective documentation of administration, there is a serious problem. There is the world of "alternative facts."

I do not want my doctor to rely on her feelings about the objectively verifiable information to decide on my health. It is also clear that the society should not rely on "alternative facts" to run the governance.   

Monday, January 16, 2017

Martin Luther King Jr (MLK) Day

There were warnings of freezing rain. Although it is a hospital holiday today, I am on call. Black ice-covered driveway greeted my journey to the hospital for rounds. Roads were largely desolate. It was a while before I saw any car. Sky was gloomy and dark. Skidding here and swerving there, I reached the hospital. I rounded with a competent clinical fellow and we were done by the afternoon. I drove back home. As I was attempting ascend up the steep driveway to my garage, the car protested. On the ice, the car veered in wanton. It would slide to the right, glide to the left, drift backwards but not up. 

Defeated, as I waited at the bottom of the driveway for some brilliant idea to materialize, I could not escape the irony of this day. A day commemorating a man who sacrificed his life peacefully striving for racial justice. Today, it feels as if the world is back to square one. The West staggers in an amnesiac stupor, completely oblivious of its treacherous past, as if it is seeking a calamitous jolt. No wonder the day appears weepy. And the town frozen in its wistful tears. 

Over a pile of snow on the sidewalk adjoining the driveway, I made an attempt. One side of the car was on grass now.  Riding the crunchy friction, I made it to the top of the driveway. The vehicle will witness this blubbering night while I seek warmth with my family inside.